Most people don’t care.
More problematic is the phrase “where no man has gone before.” What about women, aliens and robots? I’ve spent some time in the last post talking about the sexism in Star Trek.
Despite the best efforts of the creators, they were sometimes unable see past the deeply entrenched prejudices of the day. When Star Trek: The Next Generation appeared in 1987 the phrase was changed to “where no one has gone before.”
As JFK said at Rice University on September 12, 1962, four days shy of four years before Star Trek premiered: “We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade… not because [it is] easy, but because [it is] hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win…” Kennedy’s speech, with minor tweaking, could have been the opening narration of the series.
A month later he would push the country closer to global thermonuclear war than it had ever been before or since, during the Cuban missile crisis. The politics of mutually assured destruction left many wondering if there was going to be a future after all. Nuclear war didn’t seem possible, it seemed probable.
Star Trek assured us that the missiles would never fly, or that if they did, we would figure out a way to survive them. Star Trek boldly proclaimed that the future of humanity was not only possible, it was wonderful. The future world of Star Trek was not nuclear armageddon, it was Utopia.
The future Mrs and Gene Roddenberry |
Roddenberry was a former airline pilot who started writing television scripts on the side, starting in 1954 with the series Mr. District Attorney. From there he began getting regular television writing work, alternating, it seems, between cowboys and cops, doing shows like The Lieutenant and Have Gun, Will Travel. Talking about the latter series, Roddenberry made the curious claim that “Paladin, the main character, was something of a science-fiction character. I didn’t realize it at the time, he did science fiction things.” I haven’t seen enough of that series to know exactly what Roddenberry meant by this claim, and Roddenberry himself did not elaborate.
Science-Fiction character? |
Would a regular television watcher in 1966 recognized Roddenberry’s name in the credits?
Probably not. It’s unlikely such a viewer would make any connection at all between Star Trek and the earlier shows unless they read something about it in TV Guide. But Roddenberry was smart to put his name up on the screen as the creator of the show in big, bold yellow lettering against a black sky full of stars. It immortalized his name, and linked him forever with both the show itself and the larger philosophy that the show came to represent.
George Lucas is not a Jedi, Joss Whedon is not a Slayer, but Gene Roddenberry was every bit the Futurist and Humanist.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login